Discuss a dedicated deployment in your jurisdiction.
Sovereign is a proposal and contact discussion, not a provisioned service. No dedicated instance is currently available. Chat and long-running tasks are not configured on the current production deployment. Availability and every control require technical and contractual review.
No Sovereign service is provisioned.
This page describes topics for a possible future engagement. It is not a product offer, service specification, or commitment that any deployment can be delivered.
- No dedicated or jurisdiction-pinned instance is currently provisioned.
- Chat completions and long-running task processing are unavailable on the current deployment.
- Zero retention, training exclusion, audit export, SSO/RBAC, residency, and 24/7 support are not verified commitments.
- Any proposed scope is subject to technical feasibility and written contractual review.
Review topics · not a deployed configuration
- Environment
- Whether an isolated deployment is technically feasible
- Jurisdiction
- Regions and data flows that can be supported
- Data handling
- Logging, retention, deletion, and backups
- Identity
- Authentication, access roles, and key lifecycle
- Operations
- Support scope, incident process, and service levels
No endpoint, policy file, or example on this page represents a running instance. Details would only become commitments after technical validation and a signed agreement.
Current status and possible scope.
The following distinctions are intended to avoid implying that proposed deployments are already available.
Current deployment
The current production deployment does not have chat completions or long-running task processing configured.
- Chat
- Unavailable
- Tasks
- Unavailable
- Dedicated hosting
- Not provisioned
Dedicated instance
A single-tenant deployment could be evaluated for a specific workload, region, and operating model. No instance is currently provisioned or offered for self-service.
- Availability
- Requires feasibility review
- Region
- To be assessed
- Controls
- To be agreed
Sovereign deployment
Jurisdiction-specific hosting may be discussed as a proposal. Feasibility, service scope, safeguards, and commercial terms would need separate technical and contractual review.
- Availability
- Not currently available
- Residency
- Not verified
- Commitments
- None published
No controls are implied or guaranteed.
These are requirements to assess, not features currently included in a Sovereign service. Their availability and exact scope would need technical validation and written agreement.
Retention and deletion
Zero data retention is not a verified guarantee. Storage, deletion, backups, and retention periods would need technical review and written terms.
Use of customer data
Training exclusion is not currently a verified contractual commitment. Any data-use terms would need to be explicitly reviewed and agreed.
Audit and export
Prompt-level audit logging and export are not verified features. Available records, destinations, access, and retention would need assessment.
Identity and access
Sovereign SSO and role-based access controls are not verified. Identity integration and permissions would need implementation and validation.
Residency and isolation
No dedicated Sovereign environment or jurisdiction-pinned deployment is currently provisioned. Location and isolation require feasibility review.
Support and assurance
24/7 support and accreditation assistance are not currently offered as Sovereign commitments. Any service levels and assurance scope would require agreement.
No certification, accreditation, data boundary, or service-level commitment is claimed here. Any eventual deployment would require a documented technical design, security review, and agreement defining responsibilities and limitations. Your authorising body decides whether its use is permitted in your environment.
A possible review path.
This sequence is for planning a conversation only. It is not a delivery schedule, and any proposal depends on feasibility and mutual agreement.
Initial discussion
Share the use case, deployment constraints, and the requirements you need to evaluate. A discussion does not imply availability or acceptance.
Technical feasibility
Assess model service, infrastructure, region, security controls, operations, and dependencies against the requested scope.
Requirements and risk review
Review data handling, identity, audit, residency, support, and assurance needs. No control should be assumed before it is verified.
Written scope, if feasible
Only if both sides proceed, document the service boundary, responsibilities, controls, availability, support, and commercial terms before any deployment work.
Discuss your requirements. No deployment is promised.
Share your intended use, jurisdiction, and required controls. We can discuss feasibility; availability, scope, and terms remain subject to technical and contractual review.
Sovereign · proposal and contact discussion only